There is a great hush-hush of Bible reading and study when it comes to the subject of plural marriages. The Bible is filled with accounts of these. They were a very common style of family life throughout Biblical times. In fact, many of God’s greatest servants were clearly presented as having multiple wives.

We have been conditioned to push these accounts of plural marriages out of our consciousness as we read through the Bible – we just overlook them.

Were these plural marriages a sin? I have asked many students of the Scriptures about this – bringing the question into a modern setting. What would they do if they were in a polygamous society, say among an African tribe? What if they were to lead a native man with many wives to trust in Christ? What would they instruct this new believer in Christ to do regarding his many wives?

Would they instruct him to divorce and abandon all his wives except for the first one, along with all their children? Would not such a requirement be absurd? Those Bible students with whom I have spoken have agreed that it would be ridiculous.

The law of God given to Moses did not forbid multiple wives. The law did regulate almost every area of life, and polygamy was no exception. If polygamy was a sin, God would have forbidden it, rather than giving a law for its practice. Be assured that God has no problem communicating His disapproval of anything!

Beyond that, God even clearly required multiple marriages in some instances which we shall consider later. In short, polygamy is a social issue, not a sin issue.

Basic Bible Examples

We will briefly see some of the basic examples of prominent Bible characters who had multiple wives.

Abraham

Abraham, the first Hebrew, and ancestor of all Israel, the father of all who believe (Romans 4:11-12), had three wives, namely Sarah and her servant Hagar (Genesis 16:3), and Keturah (Genesis 25:1), as well as a number of concubines (Genesis 25:6).

Jacob

Jacob, father of the twelve tribes of Israel had Rachel and Leah, who were sisters, as his wives (Genesis 29). He was also husband to their servants Bilhah and Zilpah (Genesis 30:4, 9). These bore him the twelve tribes of Israel. Without these four wives there would be no Israel! Plural marriage is at the very foundation of God’s establishment of the nation Israel.

Moses

Moses was married to Zipporah, a Midianite (Exodus 2:21), and an unnamed Ethiopian (Numbers 12:1).

Gideon

Gideon, a mighty man of God and judge of Israel, who defeated the Midianites, and whose name is now used in modern times by an organization to distribute Bibles worldwide, had 70 sons (and how many daughters?), because the Scripture says that he had “many wives” (Judges 8:30).

Samuel

Elkanah had two wives, Hannah and Peninah (I Samuel 1:2). Hannah gave birth to the prophet Samuel.

David

King David, a man after God’s own heart, had plenty of wives. God gave David all his wives and said if he wanted more, God clearly told him that He would have given them to him (II Samuel 12:8).[1]

Solomon

Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines (I Kings 11:3). He wrote the Song of Solomon, a celebrated poem about marital love, to his 61st wife (Song of Solomon 6:8). Solomon’s problem was that he ended up marrying ungodly foreign wives who worshiped false gods, and turned his heart from the Lord; but go easy on Solomon. Some men have committed this same sin while married to only one wife!

Rehoboam

Rehoboam had 18 wives and 60 concubines, making him another busy man (with 28 sons and 60 daughters – II Chronicles 11:21).

God Himself a Polygamist

Amazingly even God portrays Himself as being married to two sisters, Jerusalem and Samaria (Ezekiel 23:2-4; also see Jeremiah 3:6-10; 31:31-32, noting the phrase, “I was a husband unto them).

Why would God use this analogy of multiple wives for Himself if it were sinful?

The Law regarding Polygamy

The Law had rules regulating polygamy and limiting its application under certain circumstances. For example, a man was not to marry his wife’s sister, unless he had his wife’s approval (Leviticus 18:18). Also, a man was not to marry both a woman and her mother (Leviticus 20:14). That would have presented confusing family ties.

The very fact that these specific examples are banned shows the Mosaic Law’s support of plural marriages. Exodus 21:10 tells us that if a man marries an additional wife he must not deprive his current wife of her food, clothing and sexual pleasure. In other words, a man should not take more wives than he could provide for adequately.

Just like monogamy, polygamy surely had its fair share of problems, and the law intervened to make sure the children received the inheritance to which they were entitled (Deuteronomy 21:15-17).

Polygamy was practiced without criticism throughout the Old Testament. It was legal and moral, and was clearly within the blessings of God. Indeed, the practice of marrying the wife of a deceased brother in order to ensure the family line continued (Deuteronomy 25:5-6), and marrying an unengaged damsel with whom a man had had sex (Exodus 21:16) would have actually required such a man to have more than one wife, if he was already married.[2]

An Interesting Note from History

Some of the early reformers dealt with the issue of polygamy. In fact, the three leading figures of the German reformation, Luther, Melanchthon and Bucer, signed the Wittenberg Deliberation which was mostly taken up with an examination of the biblical authority for polygamy. They jointly gave their public blessing to Philip the Magnanimous of Hesse to marry a second wife. Luther contended that polygamy is not wrong, and definitely preferable to divorce. This was a position from which he never wavered.

Clyde L. Pilkington, Jr.
Due Benevolence, Issue 2


[1]. It is amazing to discover the gems that are concealed in those scriptural passages – or parts of those scriptural passages – that we tend to ignore because they are overshadowed by other themes which are more “important” for our momentary purposes. An example can be found in Nathan’s exposé of David’s crime of adultery and murder. With it there was an endorsement of David’s polygamy – and therefore polygamy in general.

[2]. Thus the Scripture’s expression, “When a man hath taken a new wife …” (Deuteronomy 24:5). The word “new” here is in contrast to “old,” obviously a reference to the taking of an additional wife. The word “new” is translated “fresh” in Job 29:20 (“chadash” – Strong’s Hebrew Lexicon #2319).

If a worldwide count of societies were made, polygyny would prove to be the favored form of marriage.

William F. Kenkel
The Family in Perspective
University of Kentucky, 1977, p. 30

The mobile nuclear family has throughout history coexisted with the polygamous type. Even in the Western part of the world, where monogamy has long been at least the nominal rule, some people have set up polygamous families more or less openly …

If monogamous societies have always included informal polygamy, the technical polygamous societies – which make up fully three fourths of the world – have been largely monogamous.

Robert Wernick
The Family (Human Behavior), p. 35
Time-Life Books, 1974

A Hebrew man, moreover, could rule over more than one woman. So a man and a woman in marriage may have been “one flesh,” but it was more his flesh than hers, and was subject to more flesh being added. The only scriptural limit was that Hebrew men were not to marry non-Hebrew women (Deuteronomy 7:2-8).

Ronald L. Ecker
And Adam Knew Eve: A Dictionary of Sex in the Bible
Hodge & Braddock, 1995

Luther insisted that whatsoever was not specifically forbidden by Scripture was optional for the Christian, and not only is there no Biblical ban on polygamy, there are positive examples of it, in the patriarchs. In January of 1521 … Luther had written to a friend whose marital life was wholly asexual owing to the illness of his wife and who had been asked whether he might take a second wife … Luther had responded that he could raise no objection if a man wished to take several wives, since Holy Scripture does not forbid it.

William Graham Cole
Sex in Christianity and Psychoanalysis
Oxford University Press, 1955, p. 116-117

Luther was consulted by a man whose wife … was unable to fulfill her marital obligation. The man felt himself unable to sustain the burden of chastity, and asked for Luther’s advice. Luther replied that … [he should] take a second wife. Luther … exhorted him to provide sufficiently for his first wife and not abandon her.

Raymond J. Lawrence, Jr.
The Poisoning of Eros: Sexual Values in Conflict
Augustine Moore Press, 1989, p. 178

I confess, indeed, I cannot forbid anyone who wishes to marry several wives, nor is that against Holy Scriptures …

Martin Luther
Cited by:
– Robert Hutchins, Multiple Marriage: A Study of Polygamy in Light of the Bible, 1987, p. 64.
– Philip Leroy Kilbride, Plural Marriage for Our Times, 1994, p. 63

Luther’s conversations at mealtime with his family and friends were recorded for posterity by some of his followers and published as Table Talk. On one occasion Luther ventured the opinion at supper that the time would come again when a man will take more than one wife, as he had in patriarchal times.

Raymond J. Lawrence, Jr.
The Poisoning of Eros: Sexual Values in Conflict
Augustine Moore Press, 1989, p. 180

In the Jewish communities of that time, however, polygamy was still practiced.[1] Josephus, the Jewish historical writer of the first century, mentions in two places that this custom still existed among his people.

The Lord certainly must have known that polygamy still existed among His Jewish contemporaries. If His teaching on marriage was intentionally incompatible with this immemorial custom, we might expect to find some clear statement of his against the permissiveness of the Mosaic law. We might expect to find at least a clear hint of disapproval in the one passage where Jesus actually discussed the practice of levirate marriage (c.f. Matthew 22:23-30, and parallels). This practice frequently, perhaps even more often than not, involved polygamy. For marriage was so highly esteemed among the Jews that men, as well as women, normally married at an early age (usually just after puberty), and bachelors must have been very rare indeed.[2] So it may be assumed that levirate marriages very frequently must have been polygamous.

“This duty [levirate] was enjoined by the law,” says Bernard Haring, “even in cases where the brother-in-law of the widow was already married.”[3] The sin of Onan, for which he was punished with death by God, was not masturbation; it was his refusal to perform the levirate duty of taking his brother=s widow and raising up offspring for his deceased brother (cf. Genesis 38:8-10).

Eugene Hillman
Polygamy Reconsidered,
Orbis Books, 1975, pp. 20, 163-164


      

(return)1. See:

George H. Joyce, Christian Marriage: A Historical and Doctrinal Study, Sheed and Ward, 1933, 1948, pages 570-571.

Joachim Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time Jesus, Allerton, 1922, Vol. III, pages 84-86.

Salo Wittmayer Baron, A Social and Religious History of the Jews, Columbia University Press, 1937, 1952, 1962, Vol. II, pages 223-229.

Bruce Vawter, The Four Gospels, Doubleday, 1967, page 315.

(return)2. See:

Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel, McGraw-Hill, 1961, page 29.

 Salo Wittmayer Baron, A Social and Religious History of the Jews, Columbia University

Press, Vol. II, page 218-220

E. Neufeld, Ancient Hebrew Marriage Laws, Longmans, Green, 1944, pages 139

(return)3. Bernard Haring, A Theology of Protest, Strauss and Giroux, 1970, page 147.

Contrary to church teaching and bold statements that the New Testament corrects polygamy, and makes monogamy the only possibility for humanity, there is not one statement in all the New Testament that says this.

Philo Thelos
Divine Sex: Liberating Sex from Religious Tradition
Trafford Publications, 2006, p. 69

God ordained that marriage be sacred, but he did not prescribe the number of wives, neither a high nor a low one. He commanded: thou shalt be faithful to thy marriage vow, and though shalt not break it. Now it so happens that God has always created many more women than men. And He makes men die more readily than women. And He always lets the women survive and not the men … And if there is such a surplus of women, let it be taken care of by marriage, so that the meaning of God’s commandment may be heeded … If this cannot be achieved by giving each man one wife, she should have two, or whatever number may be required to take care of the surplus.

Phillip Von Hohenheim (1493-1541)
Cited by George H. Williams, The Radical Reformation
Westminster Press, 1962, p. 509

The Apostle speaks to the widows, the most worthy of charitable assistance. He did not advocate nunneries or houses for unwed mothers: he demanded marriage. Like other Biblical laws, no consideration or exception is made for situations involving married men. What would happen should a church find itself with widows but no single men? Obedience to this command would require polygamy. We have here a New Testament application of the levirate law. Christian men are to treat Christian women as sisters. If they are widowed, then they and their orphans should be adopted and incorporated into a family. If they are lawfully divorced, they are covenantally widowed and should be treated the same, as say the Early Fathers. This is the work of “pure religion” (James 1:27). Polygamy encourages this practice; monogamy discourages it.

 James Wesley Stivers
Eros Made Sacred
Patriarch Publishing House, 2007, p. 46

 

November 2009
M T W T F S S
« May    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30